SMR Reverse
Balanced By DesignBenefits
Evolved Modularity
LimaCorporate is a true pioneer in the modularity field: SMR has been the first to address multiple indications of shoulder replacement with a unique modular system, and its options keeps evolving towards the future, extending indications and improving outcomes.
Reliable Fixation
SMR can provide multiple fixation strategies -cement, press-fit, TT bone ingrowth both on humerus and on glenoid side and they are all proved to be reliable.
Proven Performance
Proven results make SMR having one of the widest clinical heritage among all the shoulder replacements worldwide.
.hd.jpg)
.hd.jpg)
About
Modularity is the enabling feature of this platform. SMR Reverse can support any kind of shoulder arthroplasty, from elective to trauma, from bone-sparing primary to revision cases [2-11]. LimaCorporate’s SMR Reverse was awarded with a 10A ODEP rating [1].
SMR Reverse offers by reversing the bearing materials of a typical reverse shoulder replacement a cross-linked polyethylene glenosphere with a superior chamfer for easier implantation, while the inferior rim allows a better load distribution. Reverse liners in CoCr (cobalt chrome) alloy are available in different sizes and with pure lateralizing options. A ceramic reverse liner option for allergic patients is also available. [10-13]
SMR Reverse HP is awarded with a 10A ODEP rating [1].
[1] 10A ODEP Rating for SMR Cemented Glenoid / Uncemented Humeral Stem. Latest ODEP Ratings can be found at www.odep.org.uk
[2] Kirsch JM, Khan M, Thornley P, Gichuru M, Freehill MT, Neviaser A, Moravek J, Miller BS, Bedi A. Platform shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(4):756-3.
[3] Weber-Spickschen TS, Alfke D, Agneskirchner JD. The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Clinical and radiological results. Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1662-7
[4] Castagna A, Delcogliano M, de Caro F, Ziveri G, Borroni M, Gumina S, Postacchini F, De Biase CF. Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1297-305.
[5] Castagna A., Randelli M., Garofalo R., Maradei L., Giardella A., Borroni M. Mid-Term results of a metalbacked glenoid component in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 92(10): 1410-1415, 2010
[6] Ross M, Hope B, Stokes A, Peters SE, McLeod I, Duke PF. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug 26
[7] Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM. Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):32-7.
[8] Martinez AA. Calvo A, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, Herrera A. The use of the Lima reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Sci. 2012 Mar;17(2):141–7.
[9] Young S.W., Everts N.M., Ball C.M., Astley T.M., Poon P.C. The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 18(4): 622-626, 2009.
[10] Poon P.C., Chou J., Young D., Malak S. F., Anderson I.A. Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis: micromotion of the baseplate and risk of loosening. Shoulder & Elbow, 2: 94– 99, 20100.
[11] Bloch HR, Budassi P, Bischof A, Agneskirchner J, Domenghini C, Frattini M, Borroni M, Zoni S, Castagna A. Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow 2014;6:156-64.
[12] Merolla G, Tartarone A, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Porcellini G. Early clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric all polyethylene glenosphere to treat failed hemiarthroplasty and the sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2017;41(1):141-8.
[13] Poon P.C., Chou J., Young D., Malak S. F., Anderson I.A. Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis: micromotion of the baseplate and risk of loosening. Shoulder & Elbow, 2: 94– 99, 20100.
Sizing
& Options
SMR Reverse The design of SMR Reverse is to be used with both cemented and uncemented stems. It features dedicated metaphyseal components to support elective and trauma surgery. Ø 36mm CoCr glenosphere (concentric or with 4mm eccentricity) can be balanced with several thicknesses of reverse liners. Fixation into glenoid is ensured by LimaCorporate’s Metal Back which has been widely verified.
Resources
Related Products
LPSI, SpaceFlex e SYMBOL® are distributed by Limacorporate S.p.A.
BIOLOX® / BIOLOX®delta / BIOLOX OPTION® is a registered trademark of a company of the CeramTec Group, Germany.